Google matches content and authority. Google ingests vast amounts of data. In 2010, Google Caffeine was capable of indexing:<\/p>\n
Caffeine lets us index web pages on an enormous scale. In fact, every second Caffeine processes hundreds of thousands of pages in parallel. If this were a pile of paper it would grow three miles taller every second. Caffeine takes up nearly 100 million gigabytes of storage in one database and adds new information at a rate of hundreds of thousands of gigabytes per day. You would need 625,000 of the largest iPods to store that much information; if these were stacked end-to-end they would go for more than 40 miles.<\/p>\n
source: https:\/\/developers.google.com\/search\/blog\/2010\/06\/our-new-search-index-caffeine<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Google has been built on PageRank since day 1 and today is no different. The only way to create a currency or value in Google is through 3rd party voting – or backlinks. Like any currency, its value is set in its difficulty to obtain. The easier the link is to get – say, from twitter or facebook, the lower the value. The same in commodities – the more prevalent a commodity or ease of access, the lower the value.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
As I wrote previously, Google E-E-A-T is not a ranking factor. Since writing this, Google has gone on to list a series of SEO myth-debunking statements (which we called out over a decade ago) yet its just not stopping the Ivory Tower Copywriters who keep insisting it is. Its not even possible. And when asked, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":4992,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[278],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"\n
No, Google did not Double down on EEAT in HCU Update<\/title>\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\t \n\t \n\t \n \n \n \n\t \n\t \n\t \n